How We Miss the Mark in This Election

The 2024 Election is a struggle between democracy and not democracy. It is not an election between political parties of a free people living in a Republic.

“One of the great ironies of how democracies die is that the very defense of democracy is often used as a pretext for its subversion. Would-be autocrats often use economic crises, natural disasters, and especially security threats—wars, armed insurgencies, or terrorist attacks—to justify antidemocratic measures.”
― Steven Levitsky, How Democracies Die: What History Reveals About Our Future

As if we have no creative gene, our major media outlets are giving autocrats, known as MAGAS, equal air time and legitimizjng them in an illusion of discussing policies and issues. Policies of authoritarinism are presented as a legitimate party platform and discussed on national television as the choice American voters must decide between.

Presenting the American public with the appearance that the “issues” are about the economy and the border is insanity. I expect our media to be free enough to educate the public by telling the truth and nothing but the truth.

Tonight is a debate between Tim Walz and a so-called VP candidate. This is normalization of evil.

What will become of us when we cannot discern the truth of this moment?

Updated on October 4, 2024We the People Podcast from the National Constitution Center discusssion with Anne Applebaum: Autocratic Threats Around the World. https://constitutioncenter.org/news-debate/podcasts/anne-applebaum-on-autocratic-threats-around-the-world

Other Resources

Timothy Snyder on Substack Thinking about…

Heather Cox Richardson on Substack Letters from An American

Anne Applebaum

Rachel Maddow

Freedom, Nation’s Capitol. Photo by Susan L Feathers, 2013

Democracy Health Checkup

American culture is a busy, somewhat fraught place as individuals and groups strive to influence the direction of markets and ideas. More and more these activities take place on digital platforms that are globally accessed and influenced by everyone from elementary school children to foreign governments and posers (human and artificial). Evermore diverse and without much internal control except that which participants choose to shape, democracies depend on the individual’s commitment to discerning the truth.

John Adams reminded citizens that “facts are stubborn things,” meaning that truth cannot be corrupted. Yet in today’s digital environment, truth is battered, shaped, recolored and redressed until it represents its opposite. An example is the kidnapping of democratic language used to support MAGA athoritarianism. Citizens duped and caught up in the web of lies are aiding authoritarian forces that seek to destroy the liberal order established after WWII and the system of governance established at our founding.

This article from Pew Research reports on the growing number of Americans who favor technology companies or the U.S. government restricting false or violent information. What do you think? What are the risks? Gains? What are the challenges the average citizen faces in attempting to discern the truth in today’s marketplace of ideas and influencers?